Wrestling commentator Bryan Alvarez has a bone to pick with WWE Raw's recent match structure. 'Every match was a carbon copy!' he exclaimed on Wrestling Observer Radio. Alvarez's critique centers on the repetitive nature of the matches, which he believes lacked variety and storytelling nuance.
According to Alvarez, each match followed a predictable pattern: the heel wrestler dominates the babyface, only for interference to turn the tide and lead to a babyface victory. This formula was evident in all three matches on the show. In the first, Je'Von Evans claimed victory over El Grande Americano after the original El Grande Americano made a surprise return. The second match saw Penta beat Bronson Reed by count out, thanks to an attack by LA Knight. And in the highly anticipated bout, Stephanie Vaquer emerged victorious against Raquel Rodriguez, with interference from Judgment Day playing a pivotal role.
But here's where it gets controversial: Alvarez argues that this format undermines the art of wrestling. He believes the traditional structure of a babyface gaining momentum, followed by a heel comeback, and then a dramatic babyface comeback, is essential for engaging storytelling. This classic ebb and flow, he claims, was missing from Raw's matches, which lacked the emotional highs and lows that keep fans invested.
Alvarez's comments spark an intriguing debate: Is there a 'right' way to structure a wrestling match? Should promoters prioritize storytelling over other elements? Share your thoughts in the comments, especially if you think Alvarez is off the mark. And don't forget to check out the full episode of Wrestling Observer Radio for more insights from the experts!
